Gremmy

-1 

1 hour ago, Lex Hale said:

You.  Lose.  Nothing.  From.  Conflict.

Either report it when someone is on a cannister because it's against the rules, or just not have it as a rule because you don't lose or gain anything from conflict and you are back at cap 20 seconds after dying.  YOU LOSE NOTHING GUYS!  JUST HAVE FUN!  PLEASE!  If you are that aggravated for how people play in something that is a completely optional event where you gain and lose nothing, stop going!

-1

common lex W

-1 this was done on accident and it was terrible, plus in the clip u can see the smokes fine 

-1 don't really have a reason just didn't really like the dirty money aspect as much on here but if done like on fivem then I can +1 it

+1

4 hours ago, Thomas Ivankov said:

I love crying on the forums its my favorite thing to do ! 

Bobby?  

+1

20 minutes ago, Tariq Jamal said:

ctrg are funny

report while exploiting lmao

+1 cops are funny lmao

4 hours ago, Lee Bread said:

Well i do understand that when u are on the receiving end of a anon report it sucks. And its hard to give a defense when u cant see the video but the positives of being able to report anon out weigh the negative of it. The rules for the most part are black and white so you either did it or u didnt so not seeing the vid is not always needed.

As a person who has not been reported in a very long time I think that there should be some way of keep the person anonymous while the person still being able to see the situation such as editing the videos and cutting out audio 

+1 

50 minutes ago, Jack Chapman said:

Mostly visual fixes, updating textures etc, but sometimes small QOL tweaks. Easiest example is the newer version of Knox.

I do have plans ot revitalise more of the older majors as well, again mainly visual but open to ideas for tweaks.

So is ministry of justice collision fixed? only asking because its the best major out

+1 

28 minutes ago, Wolffe said:

im pretty sure this is already classed as exploiting a base game mechanic if they're intentionally dipping back into water to obtain invulnerability but I could be wrong

Were saying sitting in water with a sdar shooting people outside is exploiting if normal gun could pin the water with no problem then this wouldn't have been suggested but on other video games you can shoot through water with any gun 

17 minutes ago, Brandon McHelm said:

I have not been sent to doc this entire wipe so far idk why it still exists if its never open

exactly 13 JTF but don't get sent to doc its just there for aesthetic. I hope there is a plan to more it or get rid of it. 

I'm new gen but if there's less restrictions then I agree

+1

22 minutes ago, Isaak said:

@Jordan Fischerman @Tiarnach Sullivanwhy do you guys disagree? Personally as a solo player slamming 3 teams of 4-6 it is next to impossible without a smoke especially with how the caps are designed. 

even as a gang if people are set up on caps you cant slam that's what smokes are for to help you slam

9 minutes ago, Reece Anderson said:

just remove smoke at this point. @Lee BreadIt is still broken rn, I will show you countless clips of me dying to people completely invisible. The reason why smokes are kinda good on Altis servers is because they have very visible palyer name tags, and in anzus we do not, so it is very difficult to see others while in smoke. 

-1

type shit

2 hours ago, Lex Hale said:

I don't have a numpad

If you are on cop lewis made a announcement about it if you use Ctrl+F1 it brings up a wheel to change freqs

Type of Suggestion?: (e.g. server suggestion, server rule suggestion.) rule suggestion

Please explain what the suggestion is about and why you're posting it? Because with mass conflict not allowing roaching I believe that the slam or ban rule should be added to the server as if you roach don't ever cap the point and will not get enough points to make it on the leader board. I believe a valid max of 50m off cap nothing more 

Solution on how to make this work?: Add a slam rule

Pros & Cons?: 

pros: more contestant fighting on cap

cons: People trying to improve will have to dive into more fighting

GTR

-1 come on bobby

9 minutes ago, Olav Eyjafjallajoekull said:

Bad take honestly why limit gangs on members during majors when it literally doesn't matter how many you are as longs as there is enough cops to respond 1 to 3 I don't get how cops struggle so bad winning majors try making a plan and sticking to it if you go for trades where you get one for one you should win 10/10 times based on numbers alone but instead there is 4 swat that knows what they are doing and 21 braindead`s running in because they got told to with no strategy in mind.

Not being toxic but you clearly never lead a major or played cop