Cameron Bush

@Zak Low

-1

+1

+1, 10 minutes was for higher density maps that had a lot more pvp

50 minutes ago, Pat Largerend said:

 Well, assuming Doug, but didn't want to publicly assume and make people salty if they also chip in 

Donations and payments for assets and whitelistings pay for the server

41 minutes ago, Randy_Savage said:

I think the idea is doing an overall goal for the server, so then even non-paying members would get access to the discounted price if the revenue goal is met for the month. I personally don't support this idea either, but I just wanted to clarify.

Reaching the cost each month is rewarded with working servers and a good mod, no need to shank the econ

19 hours ago, Chang Changle said:

Like a gang hideout have upgrades for BluKing. Use the same system just change it to a legal BluKing. better storage, crafting speed, etc. +1

+1

+1

Staff pay for the servers?

+1

More communication and transparency can never hurt

+1 adds to roleplay situations and helps newer players

However would need some caps like whats stopping a company adding 50 people and 50 trucks vs one has 5 people and 1 truck

Join date on profile is cooler

Those with the biggest banks are the ones I see most at the border. But the econ is a bit euro truck simulator atm, this could change w the tier 2 then 3 weaps

Fries are more sustainable than Doritos 

+1

+1

On 2/22/2024 at 3:46 PM, Andrew Smith said:

Add a “Disable Job Notifications” in phone settings

Hero

+1

+1

Sounds promising

Honestly the pistols have made me want to see a slower build up to class threes, with more rifles and semi automatic, lower calibre, weapons available and then progress into higher calibres and rates of fire.

If class threes were introduced, the interactions at the border would be a lot more hostile and sketchy and probably lead to unrealistic amounts of death but atm it’s basically just controlled trolling with the odd shoot out every hour or so

+1

+1

+1

15 hours ago, Matt Kelley said:

Plus if the chance of getting searched was lower it would probably lead to more people taking chances of going through the border with mass amounts of illegal goods leading to big busts and arrests = more action at the border. I'm not sure how much action those guys get there but, I think it would definitely be exciting being able to take down a 600 slot truck of illegal goods as compared to one guy caring a little backpack full of weed across. 

So with that being said i'm not sure what the odds of getting searched at the border are but, maybe if it was say 70% chance to not be searched, 30% to be searched I think it would definitely up the ante and lead to more action and bigger busts at the border leading to more interaction from all sides of whether you are a cop, citizen, or criminal.

This is a good idea, the worst things I find in my hundreds of searches are illegal weapons or a teeny tiny stash worth sub 5k.