Jason Board
-
Posts
277 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Jason Board
-
-
Persons name you think should be unbanned: Tom Mitchell/Mitch Tompson
Does the person acknowledge what they did was wrong: I believe so
What attributes do you think this person could bring to ANZUS? We all love Mitch, and he’s a good guy and fun to be around.-
2
-
38
-
1
-
-
Your Honor,
The Plaintiffs motion to vacate.
The Plaintiffs are filling this motion as although the Plaintiffs agreed with some claims made in the courts beliefs, the plaintiffs did not wish for the court to draw a conclusion on all of the cause of actions provided by the Plaintiffs, and points out that the court has made a ruling on Emotional Distress, while the honorable Tom Najail has also stated, "bar the infliction of emotional distress claim which the plaintiffs pose the legal question as to whether or not the MSP was justified in pointing weapons at the plaintiffs based on the fact that the warrant was not labelled ‘armed and dangerous." Furthermore, the court has failed to rule on all of the plaintiffs and selected one plaintiff to rule on. The Plaintiff's wish to proceed to discovery as the Plaintiff's do not believe they were given a fair chance to argue the claims made by the MSP. The Plaintiffs wish for the court to sustain this motion and void the conclusion previously drawn.
Thank You,
Jason Board -
1 hour ago, Tom Najail said:
Mr Berg and Mr Anderson’s motions are sustained.
The Court recognises the motion to enter discovery, however, having re-read the complaint and answer the Court believes that all claims made by the plaintiffs hinge on if the warrant was valid, bar the infliction of emotional distress claim which the plaintiffs pose the legal question as to whether or not the MSP was justified in pointing weapons at the plaintiffs based on the fact that the warrant was not labelled ‘armed and dangerous. If both parties agree, the Court is willing to make a judgment. If not, we can move to discovery.
The only reason the Court is asserting this speculation is to save all parties some time, it makes no difference to the bench.
Do both parties agree? @Jason Lee @Mike Getreel
The plaintiff agrees.
-
Your honor,
The plaintiff has multiple reasons for filing both motions, the plaintiff's have filled the motion for sanctions as it directly impacts this case and is a untrue statement that can be disproven with video evidence. The plaintiffs see no reason why the defense should say such things without reviewing the evidence provided and validating the statements that they are making. The plaintiff reserves the right to file this motion and sees no reason as to why this would be considered as vexatious litigant.
The plaintiff has filled the motion for summary judgement as the claims given by the defense lacks in relevant responses, and lacks to provide evidence to back up the claims made. The defense has made false statements in the claim presented, that can be proven by simply watching the plaintiffs Exhibit A, and has broken court rules in doing so. Furthermore, the plaintiff continues to argue the contents of our motion as we believe the defense has made fatal errors that should not be excused in this, or any court.
Thank You,Jason Board
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Your honor,
The plaintiffs would like to file a Motion for Summary Judgment.
The Plaintiff is filling this motion based on the following facts and reasons:
Below refers to A. Answering the Claims for Relief:
In the defense’s response to paragraph 1, the defense has failed to cite materials to back the claims made and failed to provide the ‘state law’ the defense is referring to, therefore, this court shall not consider this argument as valid.
In the defense’s response to paragraph 2, the defense has failed to cite materials to back any relevant claims made, and has failed to make an argument that is relevant to the claims made by the plaintiff. The defense also failed to clarify the parts admitted and the parts denied and fails to provide the ‘state law’ the defense is referring to, therefore, this court shall not consider this argument as valid.In the defense’s response to paragraph 3, the defense fails to provide a valid argument to the claims made by the plaintiff, therefore, the defense has not disputed the claims by the plaintiff and the court shall not consider this argument as valid.
In the defense’s response to paragraph 4, the defense has failed to cite materials to back the claims made, and has not made supporting factual rebuttals, therefore, this court shall not consider this argument as valid.
In the defense’s response to paragraph 5, the defense fails to provide an argument. While the defense did cite materials, the defense must provide a valid argument for the court and the defense has not, therefore, this court shall not consider this argument as valid.In the defense’s response to paragraph 6, the defense has failed to cite materials to back the claims made, while also not making supporting factual rebuttals to the plaintiffs claims that the plaintiff has provided evidence to support, therefore, this court shall not consider this argument as valid.
The plaintiff wishes for this court to rule in favor of the plaintiff, granting the full relief requested, as the defense has poorly drafted a response of the claims made by the plaintiff, filled with invalid arguments that fail to, 1) provide arguments directly relevant to the claims made by the plaintiff, 2) provide evidence to back the arguments made against the plaintiffs claims, which must be presented in order for an argument to be considered valid.
Furthermore, the plaintiff files a Motion for Sanctions, based on the argument provided by the defense claiming that, “The defendant also argues that police were forced to remain in the dwelling by being locked in there by the plaintiff.”
This allegation can be disproven in Exhibit A provided by the plaintiff. This false statement is in breach of the Rules of Professional Practice and Procedure § 2 Rule 204.
“An attorney shall not knowingly make a false statement or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to a party by the attorney.”
Thank You,Jason Board
-
Your honor,
The plaintiff objects the defense’s motion for Judgment on the Pleading’s. The plaintiff has provided adequate evidence to support and back up the claims made in our statement. In the defense’s motion, the defense refers to an argument, that the plaintiff fails to locate. All of our claims have been supplied with evidence and an explanation on why each exhibit is being used. Furthermore, the plaintiff would like to file the attached subpoena. The plaintiffs ask that the Honorable Tom Najail overrule the defense’s absurd motion and move forward in setting a trial date.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jQquOW-55aZT-H1M4_Nj_8rJmuTwdvTc5xtsR3iQci0/edit
Thank you,Jason Board
-
Your honor,
The following are the amendments that we wish to be acknowledged.
The Plaintiffs will now be:
Charlie Nugget, Johnny Robbing, Ren Sol, Jamie Oliver and Brandon Falcon.
Thank you,
Jason Board -
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff files the following Motion to Amend Pleadings in accordance with the Plaintiff's right as constituted within Article 1, Section 2, (a) of the Montana Rules of Court.
The Plaintiff wishes to introduce, alongside the already present plaintiff, the following plaintiffs to the action: Johnny Robbing, Ren Sol, Jamie Oliver and Brandon Falcon.
-
The plaintiff would like to introduce Exhibit I: https://docs.google.com/document/d/149tf26ibxNcPv0OCu4wxuICiv3ntzLvM1In8CxRXjqA/edit?usp=sharing
-
The plaintiff wishes for the honorable Tom Najail to place a 72 hour deadline on the defenses rebuttal statement to prevent delay.
-
-
Thank you Doug and the Dev team for keeping Anzus the best server on Arma. Great update, keep up the good work!
-
What is your favourite thing on 5.0? The roleplay and the possible future roleplay possibility's What is one thing you dislike on 5.0? Rebel is to far from everything What is your suggestion to fix your dislike? Move rebel above Elk-
1
-
-
Your name: Mike Getreel Your age: 16 Do you agree that applying for testing means you're willing to put A LOT of hours into testing runs, scripts and helping developers when they need a testing partner? Yes -
Mr. Slamsuger has applied for clemency.
-
6 minutes ago, Tom Najail said:
Okay sure, if we could do 5:30?
Works for me
-
@Tom Najail I will be taking Chief defense so that this case is able to proceed, I am free for 4:45PM EST
-
-
Spent years in photoshop for this baby.
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
Name: Mike Getreel
Location: (State, Country) Georgia, United States of America
Internet speed: (Speedtest.net picture do not show your IP)
Operating system: Windows 10
You agree to keep everything private and not leak anything: Yes -
57 minutes ago, James Fischer said:
so for me for the first one I feel that there should be a full wipe of everything not just money I feel as there should be a wipe of levels and perk points as well more for the reason that when new people come onto the server after the update they still have a chance. while people that grind really hard already will already have those perk points and it will basically be very easy to make money because you will still have uranium unlocked moonshine to those people that have high levels etc it will be so easy for people that have played before to make money.
I feel like existing players should be able to keep the money that they have worked for. Players who have a lot of money have spent hours and hours grinding for that money and I feel like if we wipe the money, just because new players don’t have any, It wouldn’t make any sense. New players can work for the money as well and be rich, just like others. With 5.0 coming soon, by the time people feel comfortable with money, it will just wipe again.
Jason Board - AGO Application
in Recruitment
Posted
Personal Information:
Name: Jason Board
Age: 18
Steam64ID: 76561198866792010/
Country of Residence & Time zone: USA-EST
Discord ID: 463459441405067274
Character Questions:
Do you currently possess a BAR license?: Yes
Have you been convicted in the last week of any felonies?: No
Please list any previous experience as a prosecutor below, or any other relevant experience:
PDO and attorney on the island for a year and a half
Why do you want to join the District Attorney’s Office office?: (50 word minimum)
I would like to join the AGO because I have a ton of legal experience in ANZUS, and I enjoy playing and interacting with the people on this island. I enjoyed my long time in the PDO, and met many people that made this island better than any other. I think I would be a great addition as I can add a ton of legal knowledge and am good at defending and prosecuting cases. I work extremely well with others and am able to learn and spread knowledge easily.
Personal Questions:
Are you fluent in English?: Yes
Is this the first time you are applying to the Attorney General’s office?: Yes
Why should you be accepted into the Attorney General’s office?: (50 word minimum) I believe I should be accepted to the AGO because of my extensive legal experience. I have been in the legal system for a while and I am good with people. I am always willing to learn and grow and I think the the AGO would be a perfect place for me to do that.
Do you affirm that to the best of your knowledge the information above is correct?: Yes