Jump to content
Click here to install our Arma 3 mods!
Texas: 0/150
Teamspeak: 0/150

James Webb

Member
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by James Webb

  1. 14 minutes ago, Nex Nuestra said:

    I think this is an amazing idea. Honestly, fixes any confusion with jurisdiction and everyone will have more fun. I hope that for the CG division in LDSO, you dont have to use 10 codes still, thats what made CG unique, and the main reason most join CG as opposed to LDSO as it stands rn. I think that the CG in the LDSO merge should be able to have a special division, you cant just rip the effort of MSRT and CGIS from the people who have worked for over a year to get where they are in the special divisions.

    I honestly think the CG rank to LDSO rank should be changed so petty officer is at least CPL, cause thats how its always been viewed in CG, either SGT or CPL, cause they have a lot more responsibility than sr deps in LDSO and I think you guys are completely neglecting that and discrediting the work of Petty Officers, there is literally people who have been Petty for over 200 days while being HELLA ACTIVE and doing a ton of stuff for the faction. CG promotions from what I noticed in CG about a year ago, were really strict. There were some amazing petty officers that never got promoted, just cause the people who ran CG or the low command, neglected the dedication of those members. 

    I think SMT/SLT/Devs need the input more of mid rank and low command CG cause the ranking system is not at all what any of them would agree to, and if they do, theyre lying to themselves. 

    I think we all agree, that the merge will make for more dev work at first but overtime it will get easier, but I do not think you should rip MSRT from people, etc. Also, look at all the vehicles in CG that are skinned for the divisions, etc. This all cant just be neglected.

    I like your touch on the NCO's of CG, they definitely work extremally hard making the department run like a well oiled machine, CG's definitely more laid back on policy and coms, not sure how the two personalities are going to mix well with the merge

    • Like 1
  2. I personally DO NOT want to merge, myself and many others only joined to play CG, because it was a different and unique way to play as an LEO that you don't see around. With that option gone continuing with PD doesn't seem as an appealing playstyle. It is true CG content is lacking and it feels like our content has been getting reduced with every update. Some of the MAA's are unfavorable which causes the lack of content as well but that could be fixed with communication. I feel bad for the lower enlisted ranks of CG getting put through the merge. The ones who have worked hard getting into their perspective departments and putting in the time do move up within them and to have all that hard work virtually thrown away with a merge just doesn't sit right to me. Although its possible that new connections and positions would be available to them the competition for those spots would be much greater, making them feel like their time has been wasted. As for development we already have all the assets for CG and if we're struggling I'm sure more than a few are willing to help fund it if needed. I feel like the merge would cause more work for the developers as well making entirely new skins for everything in the new boat/air department. I'm sure there are many more things I'd like to add just can't think of it right now, regardless I'm against the merge and I believe I would lose the appeal to play if the one thing I joined for is gone. Thanks

    • Like 4
    • HYPERCLAP 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By viewing ANZUSGaming's website you agree to our Terms of Use