Jay Hash

Out of curiousity why is there a plan for a Takistan Popup? 

Surely that will just draw playerbase away from the main server? 

22 hours ago, Orest Howson said:

@Joshua Bond Unless you have any evidence to submit I will be dismissing this case with prejudice do to the lack of of evidence. You have 23 hours to present something that the court can use.

Your Honor, with respect I do not understand why the court cannot issue a court order for IA to investigate and provide their findings? 

There is evidence being held within the FSP evidence logger and as such can be used post investigation from IA. Nor I or the plaintiff can obtain the evidence as we are not FSP employees, so I urge you to follow up with this please. 

30 minutes ago, Orest Howson said:

You motion is acknowledged but unless we have the specific names of the officers involved I will not be approving of any investigation for IA to look in to. Unless you have any other evidence or motions put forward within 24 hours I will be dismissing this case on the grounds of lack of evidence.

Thank you for the response, with respect your Honor, there is evidence held within the FSP evidence locker as my Client's go-pro was stripped. As such, its reasonable to assume that this evidence can be obtained by Internal Affairs if a investigation took place which would allow the discovery of those officers names. 

With that in mind, I would motion for the court to order IA to carry out an investigation using the evidence that is currently within the FSP evidence locker. 

13 minutes ago, Ross Lee said:

Out of respect for the judge presiding over this case, I will abstain from further comments. However I would like to ask, what evidence are you referring to?

Aforementioned, the gopro footage that was seized from my client by the police officers. 

9 minutes ago, Ross Lee said:

With all due respect, whatever our internal affairs department handles is quite classified and will not be released to the public. As such, I don’t believe any court order would be appropriate given the lack of evidence for the behavior our troopers have been accused of.

With all due respect sir, there is evidence currently within the FSP evidence locker and as such warrants an investigation by Internal Affairs and their findings to be provdied to the court if an order was issued. 

@Orest Howson  @Ross Lee

Thank you for the additional time your Honor, thankfully the Federal Government were quick in answering.

At this time we will be dropping Exhibit A due to the evidence unfortunately not be able to be used as there are no physical cameras at the police station. However, we would request the presiding Judge to issue a Court Order to Internal Affairs so they are required to investigate the matter and submit their findings to this court. My client has confirmed that during the time of the incident he had a go-pro equipped which was siezed by police and as such should be present within their secured evidence locker for IA to review and investigate.

16 minutes ago, Orest Howson said:

Please give me the reason for the extension.

I am currently in discussion with the Federal Government and asking them to review the building construction/design and check whether cameras are present at the Orlando Police Station or not. I believe this may take a few days to get a response and as such I would respectfully request the extension to 96 hours to allow for a response from the Federal Government. 

4 minutes ago, Orest Howson said:

 @Joshua BondPlease respond to the motion filed withing 48 hours.

Good Evening your Honour, we would respectfully request this be extended to 96 hours if possible please. 

I personally would 100% prefer option 2 but I am just concious how well this will work. I think as long as their is an effective auction house or dark web system works without the need of bitcoin, then no matter if crafters are awake or not, they can be purchased from a crafter controlled marketplace. 

Option 3 may be something to introduce at a much later stage if there are only 4-5 dedicated crafters left on the island later in the year. 

Wow damn, looking forward to the new Orlando town and great idea to put the casino there!!!

Great fucking work all!

Name: Joshua Bond
Main role on the server: Civ/Gang
Time at ANZUS: Since March 2022 but have almost 500 hours
Opinions on each rule and what you voted: 
 

Q: All cop response numbers to major crimes, minor crimes, any situation are removed from the rules. It will be up to PD command to decide how/what they want with the idea of fairness in mind.

A: As long as it is efficently monitored and managed by supervisors/leadership, I have no objection. I do hope that the police are more open to roleplaying with people who are clearly showing that they want to roleplay at minors and other situations. This should be covered further in police training. 

Q: No limit on groups, you can be in a group more than 8 during all initiations. (LEO AND CIV)
A: For civ against LEO I think this depends on the above question. If cops are allowed to bring any response numbers, then gangs/civs should be able to bring any number to majors/situations. However, I do think civ/gang vs civ/gang should be capped at 8. This is to prevent massive gangs always outnumbering the smaller gangs. Whereas, police at prime time always have large enough numbers to deal with 10-16 man majors, especially with the prescence of SWAT. 

Q: You do not need a roleplay reason to rob people doing illegal runs.
A: Ehhh, im someone who is strongly with the mindset (our enemy is the feds, not eachother). So I dont know why people want to rob other gang members, let them earn money so they can fight you more. People with less money usually means less fights as people dont want to risk loadouts and we all want more fights where possible, so let people earn money. Based on this, I think roleplay reasons should be required for robbing illegal runs. 

Q: You do not need a roleplay reason to initiate on someone except 500m from a green zone.
A: I think the roleplay reason should be expanded upon and clarified, if someone hits my car and does not stop, then that is reason. If someone blows up my car but refuses to pay insurance, thats a reason. If someone picks up my mates money on the floor but refuses to return it, thats a reason. I think it should be roleplay focused still but more scenarios explaining what counts as 'roleplay reason' for clarity. 

Acknowledgement that you've taken a spoonful of concrete: As someone who works in Health & Safety, no. Concrete is bad mkay