Jordan Olatunji

The way I see it is pistols are there to please RPers, and option 1 & 2 is also to please RPers.

so either option 3 or keep it as pistols till it is option 3.

^opionon from most intellectually advanced Anzus player 

also no one wants to come home from work and sit driving a truck, don’t make it too complicated to get a class 3 since it’s not gonna appeal to the “combat andies” this is why I say either option 3 or keep pistols since I assume class 3s are being added for the “combat andies” and this is almost the same as not having class 3s

Great update, good job Devs!

1 hour ago, Doug Jumper said:

A: I am 50/50 on this one, I think that it sucks massively when people are left out of situations but I also think a 16 man GFK Fort Knox is beyond cringe. I would love to hear suggestions to make it a bit more fair for both sides, possibly maximum 12 at majors? I am not sure.

we've never done a major with more than 11 people?

1 hour ago, Doug Jumper said:

Q: You do not need a roleplay reason to rob people doing illegal runs.
A: Again I am 50/50 with this one, some people on this server are honestly sociopathic when it comes to this rule. I don't understand the gratification of stealing someone else's stuff but I understand the freedom that comes with it. If people can play fair and not go crazy with it I think it will work but over the weekend I've seen people even developers just go way overboard with it. I would like to hear more opinions.

It adds atleast some risk to the run you're not sat on a highway with cruise control on watching youtube which is what majority of people who do runs do. before people doing runs had a constant fear of getting rolled by a massive gang and surely if we're trying to go back to 3.0 vibes you should keep this. It doesnt make sense to me to complain about player entitlement then consider giving the players more entitlement, if they're doing an illegal run or activity they should expect to encounter criminals (excluding apples)

It is the entire job of cartel/mobster to guard and protect their runs, it completely ruins the aspect and all it turns into is collecting fees passively 

1 hour ago, Doug Jumper said:

Q: You do not need a roleplay reason to initiate on someone except 500m from a green zone.
A: Personally I disagree with this one, I feel like every situation should have a roleplay reason to initiate but I feel like the restriction could make more negatives/positive again I am 50/50.

Giving players entitlement is what lead us here. imo the server should be harder and less forgiving than it is. The only things I think should be protected are legal runs like Alex said and Apples(new players)

Good shit devs 

Name you used last as PD: Jordan Jackson
Previous rank within the PD:  Patrol
Discord Name & #: Jordan#0004
How long ago were you a cop:2.0 or 3.0
Did you leave on bad or good terms: stopped playing
Would you be considered by other players as a karen roleplayer/problem player?: nah man
Are you in a group of problem players on civilian?: I don't think so
Region: EU
Steam64ID: 76561198272429011

The rules are a great start 

14 minutes ago, Cameron Long said:

It’s not the rule changes that’s the main issue although this is nice, it’s the banned players that need to be freed up. 
 

Mass unban for players , none of this community vote shite of who should be unbanned. A full on Mass unban people change and regret what they’ve done in the past I think it’s time to hear them out you’d be surprised to see who would want to possibly come back. 

Once an Mass unban has occurred then send out one of those automated emails that are linked to the forums account. 

Don’t unban the cheaters , doxers , scriptures. 
 

I have to agree with Cameron tho it’s not really a mass unban if you unban a few people that have the most support in community

just being population is valuable in current state of Anzus