-
Posts
460 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Posts posted by Jager Schweinhund
-
-
Name you used last as PD: A California Compliant german #3131
Previous rank within the PD: Snr Dep
Discord Name & #: A California Compliant German #3131
How long ago were you a cop: Earlier this month
Did you leave on bad or good terms: Yes
Would you be considered by other players as a karen roleplayer/problem player?: No
Are you in a group of problem players on civilian?: No
Region: West Coast
Steam64ID: 76561198080472206- 2
- 1
- 1
-
41 minutes ago, Paulb said:
Pre Trial ~
My honest opinion about this merge is I am mostly against it because in CG we have built a culture built on countless hours playing together to the point where I feel as if merging us into the LDSO would destroy that culture. Furthermore, Nick Boyd is an excellent captain and has been one of the best things to happen to CG losing him through a pre mature merge would make a lot of people want to leave CG. Moreover, I believe that compared to the LDSO, CG has a much better punishment system where if you get punished you always have a chance to have your side of the story heard usually through a CM, it is a brilliant system that a lot of the guardsmen that we have rely on if they get punished unfairly, which happens all the time and if you think it doesn't then you're living under a rock. Finally, I believe that USCG is a good thing to have especially for the people that want to be able to be law enforcement without having to be handing out tickets every two minutes for running a stop sign or pulling someone over and giving them a fine because they are driving at night time without headlights on.
+1 man 100% agree how this merge is structured at this point is terrible Cg and LDSO have a completely different objective and different culture and with the comment on punishments I 100% agree our punishment system is an absolute joke compared to you guys and any cop can attest our thing is a joke the fact you can appeal points and by the time it gets looked at the points are gone. This merge is genuinely the worst idea I have seen in a long time. would be a better idea just to let CG do what PD does anyway going to our majors and letting them have EQUAL SAY this merge genuinely has to be such an unfair thing I have seen in a long time for both sides. I enjoy having CG and PD separate our goals are 100% different this merge needs to either go away or needs to go back to the drawing board with PD cmd and PD members everyone not just Lts and shit but EVERYONE and the same with CG cmd and members giving ideas. This has so many issues and problems that I am seeing this needs to be thought about more and have more community say than just a few people. I would honestly rather both factions just share jurisdiction obv not for special things like for cgis and what msrt can do but for what your avg guardsman can do and what avg patrol can do just share jurisdiction. Just overall this merge I am seeing so many issues in it and it feels like an unbaked idea vs a well thought out idea I am more than willing if any PD cmd or CG cmd wants to know what these issues are I can either list them to you in DMS or put them here. I do genuinely appreciate everything Both SMT and PD and CG cmd are trying to do but this isn't a good idea. This merge will fuck over pd members so insanely hard and I don't think anyone actually sees it
- 4
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Frank Castlee said:
I still believe people should have the option to negotiate or just fight straight away? it changes nothing other than giving cops yet again another advantage if you are forced to negotiate they can set up and snake you like they always do in negotiations.@Doug Jumper
no
-
Just now, Declan Little said:
That makes no sense then
unless we get our old sops from kamdan that allows it pretty sure its gunna fall on the negotiation guidelines of rn
-
1 minute ago, Derek Lyman said:
I see what you mean. But what's annoying is getting banned because somebody's skin is too thin to handle being called out.
theres banter of your dogshit and non stop aids from people for no reason
-
1 minute ago, Declan Little said:
Swat can call of negotiations if they are stalling @Jager Schweinhund
cpt plus not a normal swat
-
Just now, Derek Lyman said:
Why do we always have to cater to those who get so easily offended by words over the internet? The game itself is rated M for mature. I've said this before, but this is AnzusLife, not SnowflakeRP. I mean I get it if things like doxxing are involved but there's nothing wrong with yelling at each other in a damn video game.
theres banter then theres just shit talk thats not fun at all and its just annoying
-
Just now, Declan Little said:
He can't call off negotiations when they are obviously stalling? |:
sadly not
-
Just now, Declan Little said:
If it seems they are going to do that call off negotiations and push
he cant lmao
-
Just now, Cade Cooper said:
Yeah but the thing is that it’s their job to push into a building when we’re holding it tbf
i mean not rly tbh irl cops wont push unless they have too or they have a full ass plan for it and even then its iffy
-
3 minutes ago, Cade Cooper said:
I think it should be considered toxicity for CG to sit outside mil ship for 3 hours and not push like they’re meant to. Also 75 points is kinda dumb Bc like shit talking at majors is literally part of it.
not toxic like at all just push out
-
Just now, Peter Clark said:
Fair rebuttal, but I don't understand why you'd bash the policies trying to change it for the better.
i dont see a single benefit civs just saying lol you got points and just being toxic it happens now even without these rules
- 1
-
Just now, Peter Clark said:
Why tho?
cops can barely get any info on a case like all you get is hey something happened near a greenvile what happened. you dont get anything of how they got your name what actually happened or anything like that idk why nothing is done to make the acu cases actually good and half decent.
- 1
-
Just now, Doug Jumper said:
The 75 points thing is just temporary, it will not be a permanent thing. Just for this week.
oh well fuck ye thats coo
-
i do think that acu thing is the dumbest fucking shit ever
-
Just now, Doug Jumper said:
I will be dealing with every case of this type of report.
ye i know im saying like if it gets to be a perm thing i dont like lower general support dealing with it IF they will be able to i actually enjoy that rule a lot
-
Just now, Doug Jumper said:
Both of you are some of the reason the policy is there. Take a break from toxicity for a week be professional.
because i dont think it would be handled properly if it goes past you and smt dealing with it? it would be fine if it was like admin plus dealing with it but anything under isnt coolio
-
1 minute ago, Liam Forder said:
75 points wtf?
yea i dont like that at all because i dont think its gunna be good if it goes past just doug reviewing it
- 1
- 1
-
-
-
2 minutes ago, Jimmy Pilgrim said:
THE SCHNEIDER CAR OMG my Grandma can design that better hollly shit
it will be fixed next update it was finished last second so pipe down sweetie
-
-
Still no jeep in the Cpl shop
-
Community Vote: Ruleset change (Response numbers, initiation rules, player to player robbing rules)
in News and Announcements
Posted
Name: Jager Schweinhund
Main role on the server: Cop
Time at ANZUS: Joined in 2019
1. Personally coming back during this new ruleset being tested cops actually were more fair with numbers than usual having this really gave the ability to match what we really needed like someone ran into tunnels okay maybe 4 cops for 2 guys isn't exactly good right oh its just a gas station then yea lets tone down to proper numbers it made it fair for both sides so people could not abuse things and cops just got stuck and overall had a far more positive time than when i last was on here and played
2. Gotta say group limiter is a no bueno move for the most part until you get to a point where you are matching or outnumbering cops by a good ass margin
3. Simple makes illegal runs better knowing at any second some guy is going to come up and fucking bop your ass
4. Not having reasons i think really opens up the witch hunting thing against civs as well as cops i think it really should be looked at carefully for more of a balance of it just because of the problems it can cause but overall not against it just needs tweaked
Acknowledgement that you've taken a spoonful of concrete: Yes i did indeed Mr.Egg Emperor the 3rd